Fragenkatalog für die Begutachtung

S&T EXCELLENCE CRITERIA

Soundness of the Challenge

1: Does the proposal demonstrate a comprehensive command of the state of the art in the field(s) and present a relevant and timely challenge?

Progress beyond the state-of-the-art.

2: Does the proposal describe an innovative approach to the challenge that advances the state of the art in the field(s)?
3: Are the objectives presented relevant to the challenge, clear and ambitious?

NETWORKING EXCELLENCE CRITERIA

Added value of networking in S&T Excellence

4: Does networking bring added value in tackling the challenge in relation to existing efforts at the European and/or international level?

Added value of networking in Impact

5: Does the proposed network contain, or present a credible plan for securing, the critical mass and range of expertise for achieving the objectives and thus addressing the challenge?
6: Does the proposal identify the most relevant stakeholders and present a clear plan to involve them as Action participants?

IMPACT CRITERIA

Impact to science, society and competitiveness, and potential for innovation/breakthroughs

7: Does the proposal clearly identify relevant and realistic impacts for science, society and/or competitiveness (including potential innovations and/or breakthroughs)?

Measures to maximise impact

8: Does the proposed networking clearly contribute to knowledge creation, transfer of knowledge and career development?
9: Is the plan for dissemination and/or exploitation of results clear and attainable and does it contribute to the dialogue between science and the general public or policy?

IMPLEMENTATION CRITERION

Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan

10: Is the work plan (WGs, tasks, activities, timeframe, deliverables and risk analysis) appropriate to ensure the achievement of the objectives?